User Tools

Site Tools


Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revisionPrevious revision
Next revisionBoth sides next revision
the_you_you_are_book [2022-07-28 04:36] Scribe of Kierthe_you_you_are_book [2022-07-28 04:37] Scribe of Kier
Line 68: Line 68:
 >As such, let's break down the lingustic term "YOU" in Dr. Hawking's preferred language: Mathematics. At its core, the word "YOU" is made up of 3 letters: Y, O, and U. I have no doubt my more astute readers have already noticed that the English pronunciation of the letter "U" (yoo) corresponds exactly to the original word: "You." What a funny and mad language we speak, in which "U" is part of "You," and yet also its own whole. Please take note of this fact, as it will be important in the following paragraph. >As such, let's break down the lingustic term "YOU" in Dr. Hawking's preferred language: Mathematics. At its core, the word "YOU" is made up of 3 letters: Y, O, and U. I have no doubt my more astute readers have already noticed that the English pronunciation of the letter "U" (yoo) corresponds exactly to the original word: "You." What a funny and mad language we speak, in which "U" is part of "You," and yet also its own whole. Please take note of this fact, as it will be important in the following paragraph.
 >So let us remove "U" from "You," and see what happens. If we remove the letter, we are left with "Yo," a common greeting I myself sometimes employ after a glass or two of wine! >So let us remove "U" from "You," and see what happens. If we remove the letter, we are left with "Yo," a common greeting I myself sometimes employ after a glass or two of wine!
-But switch the "Y" to an "I" (the two are interchangeable in linguistic circles) and you get "Io." Well, this is nonsense, yes?? It sounds like end of a children's song about a farm! I suppose you may as well return this book for a refund, as the experiment is clearly moot! Except; it is not.+>But switch the "Y" to an "I" (the two are interchangeable in linguistic circles) and you get "Io." Well, this is nonsense, yes?? It sounds like end of a children's song about a farm! I suppose you may as well return this book for a refund, as the experiment is clearly moot! Except; it is not.
 >Here it becomes necessary to reference my time abroad. As a young collegiate, I donated a semester of my studies to a cultural exploration of the nation of Italy, in hopes of healing the painful divides that had grown between the country and my own throughout the 1990's. >Here it becomes necessary to reference my time abroad. As a young collegiate, I donated a semester of my studies to a cultural exploration of the nation of Italy, in hopes of healing the painful divides that had grown between the country and my own throughout the 1990's.
 >One of the most bizarre and fascinating things I learned about Italy during my time there was that they have not one, but two words for "Me." The first is "Me," which is identical to the english [sic] translation. The second, puzzlingly, is used when the speaker is referring to himself as the subject of the sentence: Io. >One of the most bizarre and fascinating things I learned about Italy during my time there was that they have not one, but two words for "Me." The first is "Me," which is identical to the english [sic] translation. The second, puzzlingly, is used when the speaker is referring to himself as the subject of the sentence: Io.
the_you_you_are_book.txt · Last modified: 2022-07-29 14:05 by Saeid